From Tropical Topics newsletter, No. 80 January
2004, produced by Stella Martin at the Queensland Environmental
Protection Agency. Download the PDF to read the whole issue.
Snake families | Evolution | Venom |
Venomous but not necessarily deadly |
|

Emerald Python, Morelia viridia, Cape York
Photo: Greg Calvert
|
There are six main snake families in Australia—elapids
(venomous snakes, the largest group), colubrids ('harmless' snakes)
pythons, blindsnakes, file snakes and sea snakes.
Australia is the only continent where venomous snakes (70 per
cent) outnumber non-venomous ones. Despite this, very few deaths
result from snake bites. It is estimated that between 50,000 and
60,000 people die of snake bite each year around the world. By
comparison, in Australia there have been only 38 deaths from snake
bites during the last 23 years — fewer than two a year.
Snakes are generally believed to have evolved from lizards.
Why they lost their legs (though pythons retain traces of legsin
the form of small spurs) has been disputed.
Originally this was thought to have happened to allow these
creatures slidemore easily along narrow burrows. However, studies
of thefeatures of early snakes suggest they were not burrowers
butmay instead have developed from swimming, eel-like,
marinegoannas called mosasaurs.
We know about Australia’s earliest snakes only from
fossils. Many of these belonged to the Madtsoiidae group, some
ofwhich are thought to have been enormous: 6–10m in length
with the girth of a telegraph pole. Remains of these snakes have
also been found in Africa and South America suggesting they evolved
before the ancient continent of Gondwanabegan to break up about 180
million years ago.
Curiously, although they became extinct on all other continents
about 55 million years ago, in Australia — where their
remains areparticularly abundant, especially at the Riversleigh
Australian Fossil Mammal Site in Boodjamulla National Park
inQueensland — they started to decline only about 15 million
years ago.
It is thought that some of these impressive animals were still
around within the last 100,000 years so it is possible that
Aboriginal people encountered them when they arrived. There may, in
fact, be links to the Rainbow Serpent Dreamtime beliefs, widespread
among Aboriginal people.
Australia is home to some of the most venomous snakes in the
world. Why?
It is possible that strong venom may have evolved chiefly as a
self-defence strategy. It is interesting to look at the habits of
different venomous snakes. Some, such as the coastal taipan
(Oxyuranus scutellatus), bite their prey quickly, delivering
a large amount of venom, and then let go. The strong venom means
that the prey doesn’t get far before succumbing so the snake
is able to follow at a safe distance. Taipans eat only
mammals — which are able to bite back, viciously. This
strategy therefore allows the snake to avoid injury.
On the other hand, the most venomous snake, the inland taipan
(O. microlepidotus), also known as the small-scaled or fierce
snake, tends to live in the burrows of its main prey, the
long-haired rat. Unable to retreat from its prey in this confined
space it has a greater need to finish it off quickly. Its more
risky attack strategy entails holding its prey with its body and
biting repeatedly. However, this snake can deliver, in one bite,
more than40 000 times the venom needed to kill a 200 gram rat and
it contains a special component which causes the toxin to rapidly
invade the body. Its prey has little chance to fight back. While
coastal and inland taipans eat only mammals, other venomous snakes
feed largely on reptiles and frogs. Venom acts slowly on these
‘cold-blooded’ creatures with slow metabolic rates, so
perhaps it needs to be especially strong. In addition, as many prey
species develop a degree of immunity to snake venom, a form of
evolutionary arms race may have been taking place.… but not
necessarily deadly.
Some Australian snakes may be particularly venomous, but they
are not the most dangerous for humans, as the graph below shows.
The low fatality rate, compared with many other parts of the world,
is attributed to Australia’s sparse population, use of better
footwear and better medical treatment, including availability of
antivenoms. Also, Australian snake are shy and comparatively
reluctant to bite, often not injecting venom when they do bite.
Indeed, a New South Wales study showed that it is humans who are
more aggressive with people 100 times more likely to attack a snake
than the other way round.
|
A comparison of annual snakebite
fatalities per million people from around the world. To
standardise comparisons, published data compiled between 1945-1960
was used. Australia’s current figure is 0.13 per million but
during the period used here it was 0.45 per million. Graph courtesy
Brian Bush.
|